![]() Personally I thing OGG and MP3 is pretty comparable. Mp3 has become the universal format–everything else is for the truly dedicated geek wrote: So if you intend to someday change brands of music player or share songs with friends, ogg may not be the most practical choice, even if in principle I love the idea of an open-source, hi-fi encoder. Ogg may (or may not–I haven’t tested it myself) sound slightly better than mp3 for the same number of kbps, though I doubt the very slight difference would be apparent to anyone without super hi-fi playback. (The bitrate is how many bits of information are used per second of music–more means better sound.) In Windows Media Player (under Rip Music) you can raise the quality slider up to 192 or 256 or even 320 kbps and your mp3s will start to sound like music again.įLAC will be a more accurate copy, but a far bigger one. Your problem is that you are using mp3 at 128 kbps, a low-quality bitrate. wav (a copy of the CD files, not compressed) and Apple’s proprietary formats that iPods play.īut George-W, your problem is not that you are using mp3. But Winamp makes you pay for ripping, Windows Media Player does only mp3 and Windows Media formats, and iTunes only does mp3. Windows Media Player and iTunes (and I think Winamp) use CDDB, a commercial and slightly more reliable source for tags. ![]() Media Monkey and EAC are both good for that, though not for the very newest albums because they use the user-generated Freedb online database, and some volunteer somewhere has to do the tags. What you want in a ripper, however, is something that will also go online and get the tag information as it rips. Media Coder converts between many filetypes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |